Does the Pharmaceutical Sector Have a Coresponsibility for the Human Right to Health?

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2):298-308 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The highest attainable standard of health is a fundamental human right, which has been part of international law since 1948. States and their institutions are the primary duty bearers responsible for ensuring that human rights are respected, protected, and fulfilled. However, more recently it has been argued that pharmaceutical companies have a coresponsibility to fulfill the human right to health. Most prominently, this coresponsibility has been expressed in the United Nations Millennium Goal 8 Target 4. “In cooperation with pharmaceutical companies, provide access to affordable essential drugs in developing countries.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Right to Health Care.Pavlos Eleftheriadis - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (2):268-285.
Introduction: Access to Life-Saving Medicines and Intellectual Property Rights.Doris Schroeder - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2):277-278.
Are pharmaceutical patents protected by human rights?Joseph Millum - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):e25-e25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
84 (#196,134)

6 months
15 (#234,431)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Doris Schroeder
University of Central Lancashire

References found in this work

Mortal questions.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mortal Questions.[author unknown] - 1979 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 43 (3):578-578.
Some puzzles about the evil of death.Fred Feldman - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (2):205-227.

View all 9 references / Add more references