Memory 28 (3):399-416 (
2020)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
Recalling autobiographical memories with others can influence the quality of recall, but little is
known about how features of the group influence memory outcomes. In two studies, we
examined how the products and processes of autobiographical recall depend on individual
vs. collaborative remembering and the relationship between group members. In both studies,
dyads of strangers, friends, and siblings recalled autobiographical events individually
(elicitation), then either collaboratively or individually (recall). Study 1 involved typing
memory narratives; Study 2 involved recalling aloud. We examined shifts in vividness,
emotionality, and pronoun use within memory narratives produced by different relationship
types. In Study 2, we also coded collaborative dyads’ “collaborative processes” or
communication processes. In Study 1, all relationships showed decreased positive emotion
and I-pronouns and increased negative emotion within collaboratively-produced memory
narratives. In Study 2, all relationships showed increased vividness, reduced emotionality and
positive and negative emotion, and increased I- and we-pronouns within collaborativelyproduced memory narratives. However, strangers used collaborative processes differently
from friends and siblings. Some collaborative processes were associated with memory
qualities. Across studies, collaboration influenced memory quality more than did relationship
type, but relationship type influenced dyads’ recall dynamics. These findings indicate the
complexity of social influences on memory.