In defence of ageism

Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (3):188-194 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Health care should be preferentially allocated to younger patients. This is just and is seen as just. Age is an objective factor in rationing decisions. The arguments against 'ageism' are answered. The effects of age on current methods of rationing are illustrated, and the practical applications of an age-related criterion are discussed. Ageist policies are in current use and open discussion of them is advocated.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In defence of ageism.A. B. Shaw - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (2):117-118.
In defence of ageism.M. M. Rivlin - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (4):270-271.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
32 (#487,761)

6 months
13 (#276,301)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?