Weak and strong theories of truth

Studia Logica 68 (1):89-101 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A subtheory of the theory of self-referential truth known as FS is shown to be weak as a theory of truth but equivalent to full FS in its proof-theoretic strength.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Editorial introduction.Volker Halbach - 2001 - Studia Logica 68 (1):3-20.
Conservative theories of classical truth.Volker Halbach - 1999 - Studia Logica 62 (3):353-370.
Strong and Weak Truth Principles.Bartosz Wcisło Mateusz Łełyk - 2017 - Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 29:107-126.
Truth in applicative theories.Reinhard Kahle - 2001 - Studia Logica 68 (1):103-128.
Truth Values and Proof Theory.Greg Restall - 2009 - Studia Logica 92 (2):241-264.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
98 (#174,272)

6 months
18 (#191,063)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Reflecting on incompleteness.Solomon Feferman - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (1):1-49.
An Axiomatic Approach to Self-Referential Truth.Harvey Friedman & Michael Sheard - 1987 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 33 (1):1--21.
How truthlike can a predicate be? A negative result.Vann McGee - 1985 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 14 (4):399 - 410.
A theory of formal truth arithmetically equivalent to ID.Andrea Cantini - 1990 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (1):244 - 259.
A System Of Complete And Consistent Truth.Volker Halbach - 1994 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (3):311-327.

View all 11 references / Add more references