Ernst Mach: A Genetic Introduction to His Educational Theory and Pedagogy

In Michael R. Matthews (ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer. pp. 2359-2357 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ernst Mach was the first to write on the question of the implications on human knowledge, scientific knowledge and science education resulting from the evolutionary theory (i.e. the ideas by Lamarck, Erasmus Darwin, Spencer or Wallace as synthesised by Charles Darwin 1859 in his Origin of the Species). The ideas made a consistent genetic world view possible, which develops all scientific ideas (from all sciences) and experiences from the senses. Mach described this as the “adaptation of the thoughts to the facts and the facts to each other” (Mach 1905). For Mach, science education is the key to identify the necessary changes as well as implementing them. The question is how can we as humans adapt(Adapt and adaptation is meant here as a reciprocal process between the “world” and the “self”. The individual and the world are not separate, but the individual and human thoughts are part of “the world”, as well as “the world” is a necessary part of human perception and thinking. This is Mach’s monism. For Mach (and for Richard Avenarius) the separation of the “world” and the “self” is only the result of a pragmatic adaptation of the individual to the fact that some clusters of sensual impressions (one’s own body perception) are more consistent over time than others. Initially for the child there is no such separation. For instance, the concept of the “others” is constructed before a consistent concept of self.) our thoughts to a consistent world view, which is plastic, i.e. itself continuously adapting and transforming.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sensualistischer phänomenalismus und denkökonomie. Zur wissenschaftskonzeption Ernst machs.Ralf Goeres - 2004 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (1):41-70.
Ernst Mach and the Episode of the Monocular Depth Sensations.Erik C. Banks - 2001 - Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 37 (4):327-348.
Metaphysics, Carnap's Remedy and Mach's Science.Alfred Schramm - 1998-1999 - Philosophia Scientiae 3 (2):109 - 120.
Ernst Mach leaves 'the church of physics'.John Blackmore - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (4):519-540.
Reading Nietzsche through Ernst Mach.Nadeem J. Z. Hussain - 2004 - In Gregory Moore & Thomas H. Brobjer (eds.), Nietzche and Science. Ashgate.
Ernst Mach: Neutral monism.Manjoulekha Bhattacharya - 1972 - Studi Internazionali Di Filosofia 4:145-182.
Ernst Mach en onze tijd.Ernst Mach - 1939 - Synthese 4 (2):96 - 105.
Uit: Ernst Mach, Analyse der Empfindungen.Ernst Mach - 1939 - Synthese 4 (2):106 - 107.
De la définition de la niasse.Ernst Mach - 2004 - Philosophia Scientiae: Travaux d'Histoire Et de Philosophie des Sciences. 2003.[Dossier Mach] 7:105.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-18

Downloads
12 (#1,081,406)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Visuel wahrgenommene Figuren.Edgar Rubin - 1923 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 96:145-147.
The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field.Jacques Hadamard - 1956 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (26):177-179.
Popular Scientific Lectures.E. Mach - 1895 - The Monist 6:151.
Gestalt theory.Max Wertheimer - 1944 - In Willis D. Ellis (ed.), Social Research: An International Quarterly. Harcourt, Brace and Co.

View all 12 references / Add more references