Authors
Abstract
Four intuitions are recurrent and influential in theories about conditionals: the Ramsey’s test, the Adams’ Thesis, the Equation, and the robustness requirement. For simplicity’s sake, I call these intuitions ‘the big four’. My aim is to show that: (1) the big four are interdependent; (2) they express our inferential dispositions to employ a conditional on a modus ponens; (3) the disposition to employ conditionals on a modus ponens doesn’t have the epistemic significance that is usually attributed to it, since the acceptability or truth conditions of a conditional is not necessarily associated with its employability on a modus ponens.
Keywords Adam's thesis  the equation  Ramsey's test  conditionals  modus ponens
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Guide to Conditionals.Jonathan Bennett - 2003 - Oxford University Press UK.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

New Surprises for the Ramsey Test.Malte Willer - 2010 - Synthese 176 (2):291 - 309.
A Counterexample to Modus Ponenses.Matthew Mandelkern - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy 117 (6):315-331.
Modus Ponens Under the Restrictor View.Moritz Schulz - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (6):1001-1028.
Chancy Modus Ponens.Sven Neth - 2019 - Analysis 79 (4):632-638.
Modus Tollens Probabilized.Carl G. Wagner - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):747-753.
Adaptively Applying Modus Ponens in Conditional Logics of Normality.Christian Straßer - 2012 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 22 (1-2):125-148.
Modus Ponens Defended.Justin Bledin - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy 112 (2):57-83.
Naive Modus Ponens and Failure of Transitivity.Andreas Fjellstad - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (1):65-72.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-01-30

Total views
13 ( #681,075 of 2,330,100 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #81,713 of 2,330,100 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes