Ratio Juris 26 (3):326-357 (2013)

A. John Simmons
University of Virginia
Theories of political authority divide naturally into those that locate the source of states' authority in the history of states' interactions with their subjects and those that locate it in structural (or functional) features of states (such as the justice of their basic institutions). This paper argues that purely structuralist theories of political authority (such as those defended by Kant, Rawls, and contemporary “democratic Kantians”) must fail because of their inability to solve the boundary problem—namely, the problem of locating the boundaries between different states' domains of authority in the natural or intuitive places
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/raju.12017
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,348
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Law of Peoples.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Political Obligation.Richard Dagger - unknown - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Reconceiving the Democratic Boundary Problem.David Miller - 2020 - Philosophy Compass 15 (11):1-9.
Authority, Nationality, and Minorities.Alex Schwartz - 2015 - Ratio Juris 28 (3):354-371.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
118 ( #84,775 of 2,420,319 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #351,157 of 2,420,319 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes