Legal Theory 19 (3):307-330 (2013)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The idea that human beings are intellectually self-governing plays two roles in free-speech theory. First, this idea is frequently called upon as part of the justification for free speech. Second, it plays a role in guiding the translation of free-speech principles into legal policy by underwriting the ascriptive framework through which responsibility for certain kinds of speech harms can be ascribed. After mapping out these relations, I ask what becomes of them once we acknowledge certain very general and profound limitations in people's capacity for intellectual self-governance. I argue that acknowledging these limitations drastically undermines the putative justifications for free speech of the type that I identify in the first part of the paper. I then show how we can reformulate an account of intellectual and doxastic responsibility on which we may still be held responsible for what we think or believe even though we lack agent-causal capacities in our thinking and believing. Then, in light of this ascriptive account of intellectual responsibility, I show how the key ideahave minds of their owncan (and should) still play a significant role in guiding the legislative outworkings of free speech
|
Keywords | Free Speech Thomas Scanlon Intellectual Agency Freedom of Thought Liberalism |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1017/s1352325213000177 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Responsibility for Attitudes: Activity and Passivity in Mental Life.Angela M. Smith - 2005 - Ethics 115 (2):236-271.
Deciding to Believe.Bernard Williams - 1973 - In Problems of the Self. Cambridge University Press. pp. 136--51.
Doxastic Compatibilism and the Ethics of Belief.Sharon Ryan - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):47-79.
View all 12 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
What is Free Speech?David Braddon-Mitchell & Caroline West - 2004 - Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (4):437-460.
The Free Speech Argument Against Pornography.Caroline West - 2003 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (3):391 - 422.
Censorship and Freedom of Speech.Robert Sparrow - 2004 - In Justin Healy (ed.), Censorship and Free Speech. The Spinney Press. pp. 1-4.
A Kantian Conception of Free Speech.Helga Varden - 2010 - In Deidre Golash (ed.), Free Speech in a Diverse World. Springer.
How the Shadow University Attack on First Amendment Defense of Private Speech Paved the Way for the War Party Attack on First Amendment Defense of Public Speech.Norman Arthur Fischer - 2010 - Social Philosophy Today 26:39-51.
Electronic Commerce and Free Speech.Jessica Litman - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (3):213-225.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-01-15
Total views
319 ( #33,358 of 2,517,898 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #58,488 of 2,517,898 )
2014-01-15
Total views
319 ( #33,358 of 2,517,898 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #58,488 of 2,517,898 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads