Comments on “The Emulating Interview... with Rick Grush”

Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 2 (2):35–44 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Author comments Rick Grush’s statements about emulation and embodied approach to representation. He proposes his modification of Grush’s definition of emulation, criticizing notion of “standing in for”. He defends of notion of representation. He claims that radical embodied theories are not applicable to all cognition

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Komentarze do „Emulującego wywiadu… z Rickiem Grushem”.Aaron Sloman - 2011 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 2 (2):141-151.
The Emulating Interview… with Rick Grush.Rick Grush & Przemysław Nowakowski - 2010 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 1 (1):213-224.
Issues of implementation matter for representation.Francisco Calvo Garzón - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):397-398.
Representation: Emulation and anticipation.Georgi Stojanov & Mark H. Bickhard - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):418-418.
The functionalist's body.Robert D. Rupert - 2014 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 5 (2):258-268.
If emulation is representation, does detail matter?Lynn Andrea Stein - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):417-417.
Amodal imagery in rostral premotor areas.Takashi Hanakawa, Manabu Honda & Mark Hallett - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):406-407.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-28

Downloads
613 (#30,134)

6 months
86 (#61,195)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron Sloman
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.

Add more references