Form, technique and liberation: Schiller’s influence on Marcuse’s philosophy of technology

Human Affairs 30 (4):535-544 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article seeks to analyze the theory of technology formulated by the philosopher Herbert Marcuse (1898–1979). It shows the ways in which the author repurposes fundamental concepts of classical aesthetics in order to formulate a theory of technology aimed at liberating both nature and humanity. To this end, we argue that Marcuse mobilizes the theories of Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) and Friedrich Schiller (1759–1805). In the first part of the article, we tackle some important aspects of Kant’s and Schiller’s aesthetic theories. We begin with an analysis of Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790), focusing on central concepts that would later be absorbed by Schiller and Marcuse. Next, we try to show the reception of the Third critique in Schiller’s On the Aesthetic Education of Man (1795) and this author’s contribution to aesthetic studies within political thought. In the second part, we focus on Marcuse’s work, highlighting two key moments in his analysis on technology. We show that his theory undergoes transformation and development until it reaches its stable form in the 1960s and 1970s, during which the author proposes a new theory of technology based on human aesthetic possibilities whose goal is the liberation of nature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Teaching Marcuse.Lucio Angelo Privitello - 2013 - Radical Philosophy Review 16 (1):109-122.
Teaching Marcuse.Lucio Angelo Privitello - 2013 - Radical Philosophy Review 16 (1):109-122.
Marcuse or Habermas: Two critiques of technology.Andrew Feenberg - 1996 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (1):45 – 70.
Play, Idleness and the Problem of Necessity in Schiller and Marcuse.Brian O'Connor - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (6):1095-1117.
Herbert Marcuse and Social Media.Christian Fuchs - 2016 - Radical Philosophy Review 19 (1):111-141.
Schiller on Freedom and Aesthetic Value: Part I.Samantha Matherne & Nick Riggle - 2020 - British Journal of Aesthetics 60 (4):375-402.
On Estrangement Effect of Aesthetic Form of Herbet Marcuse.Wen-jie Huang - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (2):83-88.
Schiller on Freedom and Aesthetic Value: Part II.Samantha Matherne & Nick Riggle - 2021 - British Journal of Aesthetics 61 (1):17-40.
Marcuse’s "Transcendent Project" at 50.Marcelo Vieta - 2016 - Radical Philosophy Review 19 (1):143-172.
Herbert Marcuse: a critical reader.John Abromeit & W. Mark Cobb (eds.) - 2004 - New York: Routledge.
Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader.John Abromeit & W. Mark Cobb (eds.) - 2003 - New York: Routledge.
Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader.John Abromeit & W. Mark Cobb (eds.) - 2003 - New York: Routledge.
Circular Art of Life.Martin Klebes - 2008 - Idealistic Studies 38 (3):193-207.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-10

Downloads
27 (#585,141)

6 months
4 (#779,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Juliano Bonamigo Ferreira de Souza
Université Catholique de Louvain

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations