- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Theorising Religion. Classical and Contemporary Debates
Zeitschrift für Religions- Und Geistesgeschichte 60 (2):179-182 (2008)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era.Christine Sylvester - 1994 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reply to Rowe.Daniel Howard-Snyder & Michael Bergmann - 2003 - In Michael Peterson (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell.
It Is Not Reasonable to Believe That Only One Religion Is True.”.Peter Byrne - 2004 - In Michael L. Peterson & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell. pp. 201--210.
It is not Rational to Believe in the Resurrection.Michael Martin - 2004 - In Michael L. Peterson & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell. pp. 174--84.
Debates in Indian philosophy: classical, colonial, and contemporary.A. Raghuramaraju - 2006 - New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Do mystics see God?Evan Fales - 2004 - In Michael L. Peterson & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell. pp. 145--148.
Reply to Moser.”.J. Schellenberg - 2004 - In Michael L. Peterson & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell. pp. 54--56.
Feminism after postmodernism: theorising through practice.Marysia Zalewski - 2000 - New York: Routledge.
Rejoinder to Zimmerman.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2004 - In Michael Peterson (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell.
Divine Hiddenness Does Not Justify Atheism.Paul Moser - 2004 - In Michael L. Peterson & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell. pp. 42.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-09
Downloads
29 (#547,420)
6 months
1 (#1,463,894)
2013-12-09
Downloads
29 (#547,420)
6 months
1 (#1,463,894)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-55b469568f-znn98 uwo