Empathy

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite its linguistic roots in ancient Greek, the concept of empathy is of recent intellectual heritage. Yet its history has been varied and colorful, a fact that is also mirrored in the multiplicity of definitions associated with the empathy concept in a number of different scientific and non-scientific discourses. In its philosophical heyday at the turn of the 19th to the 20th century, empathy had been hailed as the primary means for gaining knowledge of other minds and as the method uniquely suited for the human sciences, only to be almost entirely neglected philosophically for the rest of the century. Only recently have philosophers become again interested in empathy in light of the debate about our folk psychological mindreading capacities. In the second half of the last century, the task of addressing empathy was mainly left to psychologists who thematized it as a psychological phenomenon and process to be studied by the method of the empirical sciences. Particularly, it has been studied by social psychologists as a phenomenon assumed to be causally involved in creating prosocial attitudes and behavior. Nevertheless, within psychology it is at times difficult to find agreement of how exactly one should understand empathy; a fact of which psychologists themselves have become increasingly aware. The purpose of this entry is to clarify the concept of empathy by surveying its history in various philosophical and psychological discussions and by indicating why empathy was and should be regarded to be of such central importance in understanding human agency in ordinary contexts, in the human sciences and for the constitution of ourselves as social and moral agents

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rejecting Empathy for Animal Ethics.T. J. Kasperbauer - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (4):817-833.
What is Empathy For?Joel Smith - 2017 - Synthese 194 (3).
Introspection and empathy.Edward Bradford Titchener - 2014 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 7 (1):25-30.
Empathy, Rationality, and Explanation.Mark Bevir & Karsten Stueber - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2):147-162.
The Mandate of Empathy.Michael Slote - 2010 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (3):303-307.
Empathy as Research Methodology.Eric Leake - 2019 - In Pranee Liamputtong, Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer Singapore. pp. 237-252.
Rediscovering Empathy. [REVIEW]Sarah Borden - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):118-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
181 (#139,752)

6 months
31 (#121,098)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karsten Stueber
College of the Holy Cross

Citations of this work

The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology.Herman Cappelen, Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Robotic Nudges for Moral Improvement through Stoic Practice.Michał Klincewicz - 2019 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 23 (3):425-455.
The emergence of value: human norms in a natural world.Lawrence Cahoone - 2023 - Albany: State University of New York Press.

View all 43 citations / Add more citations