Understanding Versus Explanation? How to Think about the Distinction between the Human and the Natural Sciences
Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (1):17 - 32 (2012)
Abstract This essay will argue systematically and from a historical perspective that there is something to be said for the traditional claim that the human and natural sciences are distinct epistemic practices. Yet, in light of recent developments in contemporary philosophy of science, one has to be rather careful in utilizing the distinction between understanding and explanation for this purpose. One can only recognize the epistemic distinctiveness of the human sciences by recognizing the epistemic centrality of reenactive empathy for our understanding of rational agency, that is, by emphasizing the psychological component in the concept of understanding that nineteenth-century philosophers like Droysen, in contrast to twentieth-century hermeneutic philosophers, still acknowledged. In addition, the essay will show in detail that merely pointing to the fact that narratives have a cognitive function in the domain of the human sciences, as is common among philosophers of history, does not provide us with a sufficient demarcation criterion for distinguishing between the human and natural sciences
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Understanding Others Through Primary Interaction and Narrative Practice.Shaun Gallagher & Daniel D. Hutto - 2008 - In J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha & E. Itkonen (eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. John Benjamins. pp. 17â38.
Aspects of Scientific Explanation.Carl Gustav Hempel - 1965 - In Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Free Press. pp. 504.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Epistemology of Understanding.Neil Cooper - 1995 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):205 – 215.
Medicine as Combining Natural and Human Science.H. L. Dreyfus - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):335-341.
The Essential Nature of the Method of the Natural Sciences: Response to A. T. Nuyen's "Truth, Method, and Objectivity: Husserl and Gadamer on Scientific Method".Joseph Becker - 1993 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (1):73-76.
Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk Psycholgy, and the Human Sciences.Karsten Stueber - 2006 - MIT Press.
Understanding in the Social Sciences and History.Rolf Gruner - 1967 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):151 – 163.
Natural Philosophy and the Use of Causal Terminology: A Puzzle in Reid's Account of Natural Philosophy.Aaron D. Cobb - 2010 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 8 (2):101-114.
More on Understanding in the Social Sciences.Frank Cunningham - 1967 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):321-326.
Explanation and Understanding in the Human Sciences.Gurpreet Mahajan - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
Dedukcyjno-nomologiczny model wyjaśniania Hempla a wyjaśnianie w naukach humanistycznych.Adam Włodarczyk - 2009 - Filozofia Nauki 17 (4).
Explanation and Understanding: Action as “Historical Structure”.Jakub Čapek - 2008 - Philosophia 36 (4):453-463.
Husserl, Weber, Freud, and the Method of the Human Sciences.Donald McIntosh - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (3):328-353.
The Role of Umwelt in Husserl's Aufbau and Abbau of the Natur/Geist Distinction.Adam Konopka - 2009 - Human Studies 32 (3):313 - 333.
The Cognition-Knowledge Distinction in Kant and Dilthey and the Implications for Psychology and Self-Understanding.A. R. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):149-164.
Added to index2012-01-19
Total downloads76 ( #69,843 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #35,746 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?