From Literature to Biterature: Lem, Turing, Darwin, and Explorations in Computer Literature, Philosophy of Mind, and Cultural Evolution

Mcgill-Queen's University Press (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From Literature to Biterature is based on the premise that in the foreseeable future computers will become capable of creating works of literature. Among hundreds of other questions, it considers: Under which conditions would machines become capable of creative writing? Given that computer evolution will exceed the pace of natural evolution a million-fold, what will such a state of affairs entail in terms of art, culture, social life, and even nonhuman rights? Drawing a map of impending literary, cultural, social, and technological revolutions, Peter Swirski boldly assumes that computers will leap from mere syntax-driven processing to semantically rich understanding. He argues that acknowledging biterature as a species of literature will involve adopting the same range of attitudes to computer authors (computhors) as to human ones and that it will be necessary to approach them as agents with internal states and creative intentions. Ranging from the metafiction of Stanislaw Lem to the "Turing test" (familiar to scientists working in Artificial Intelligence and the philosophers of mind) to the evolutionary trends of culture and machines, Swirski's scenarios lay the groundwork for a new area of study on the cusp of literary futurology, evolutionary cognition, and philosophy of the future.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Literature, Analytically Speaking. [REVIEW]Iris Vidmar - 2011 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (3):358-370.
Evolution and literary theory.Joseph Carroll - 1995 - Human Nature 6 (2):119-134.
Darwin the writer.George Levine - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Why a deep understanding of cultural evolution is incompatible with shallow psychology.Dan Sperber - 2006 - In N. J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Roots of Human Sociality. Oxford: pp. 431-449.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-22

Downloads
5 (#1,514,558)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references