Our right to in vitro fertilisation--its scope and limits

Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):802-806 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There exists a derived negative right to procreative freedom, including a right to in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and to the exercise of selective techniques such as preimplantation genetic diagnosis. This is an extensive freedom, including not only the right to the exercise of a responsible parenthood, but also, in rare cases, to wrong decisions. It includes also a right for less than perfect parents to the use of IVF, and for IVF doctors to assist them, if they want and can agree about the terms

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Saviour siblings.M. Spriggs - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):289-289.
In vitro fertilisation: the major issues.P. Singer & D. Wells - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (4):192-199.
Genetic Affinity and the Right to ‘Three-parent IVF’.G. Owen Schaefer & Markus Labude - 2017 - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 34 (12):1577-1580.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
42 (#369,536)

6 months
14 (#253,070)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Torbjörn Tännsjö
Stockholm University

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Overpopulation and the Quality of Life.Derek Parfit - 2013 - In Muresan Valentin & Majima Shunzo (eds.), Applied Ethics: Perspectives from Romania. Center for Applied Ethics and Philosophy, Hokkaido University. pp. 145-164.
Weighing Lives.Daniel M. Hausman - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):718-722.

View all 12 references / Add more references