Substance, relations, and arguments about the nature of space-time

Philosophical Review 100 (3):363-397 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2185065

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What can we learn about the ontology of space and time from the theory of relativity?John D. Norton - 2000
, 2003.Jeffrey Grupp - unknown
In Defence of Discrete Space and Time.Jean Paul van Bendegem - 1995 - Logique Et Analyse 38 (150-1):127-150.
Newton on substance.Matthew Priselac - unknown
Moderate structural realism about space-time.Michael Esfeld & Vincent Lam - 2008 - Synthese 160 (1):27 - 46.
The substance of Brentano's ontology.Barry Smith - 1987 - Topoi 6 (1):39-49.
The metaphysical expositions of space and time.Randy Wojtowicz - 1997 - Synthese 113 (1):71-115.
On field's argument for substantivalism.Jerzy Gołosz - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):5 – 16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
204 (#94,896)

6 months
35 (#98,066)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

A new approach to the relational‐substantival debate.Jill North - 2018 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 11:3-43.
Geometry and motion.Gordon Belot - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):561--95.
Broken Symmetry and Spacetime.David John Baker - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (1):128-148.

View all 30 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references