Plants, Partial Moral Status, and Practical Ethics

Journal of Consciousness Studies 28 (1-2):184-209 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most authors who work with moral status automatically dismiss the possibility that plants are the kinds of entities that have moral status. This dismissal coheres with our intuitions about common-sense morality: if plants do not have moral status then we do not have any direct moral obligations to plant life. An implication of such a view is that any suggestion otherwise commits one to be in favour of an absurd conclusion. However, given the recent literature and empirical evidence on plant minds, there are reasons to accept a different perspective that finds the absurd conclusion plausible.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

For Hierarchy in Animal Ethics.Shelly Kagan - 2018 - Journal of Practical Ethics 6 (1):1-18.
The Moral Status of the Joshua Tree.Jane Duran - 1999 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):113-120.
The status of moral status.Benjamin Sachs - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):87-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-17

Downloads
83 (#195,778)

6 months
16 (#138,396)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ethan Terrill
Northern Virginia Community College

Citations of this work

On the Idea of Degrees of Moral Status.Dick Timmer - forthcoming - Journal of Value Inquiry:1-19.
Better to be a Pig Dissatisfied than a Plant Satisfied.Ethan C. Terrill & Walter Veit - 2024 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 37 (4):1-17.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references