Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1267-1281 (2013)

The recommendations, during the past 20 years, to improve PhD scientific training and graduate school success, have focused on the significance of mentoring. It is well established that PhD students with mentors have significantly more success in graduate school as demonstrated by publishing papers before they graduate and by making presentations. Have faculty and academic institutions embraced the mentoring role? This study explores the views of 3,500 scientists who have primary responsibilities to educate PhD and MD/PhD students. Faculty members report they are more likely to prefer being viewed as advisors (54 %) than mentors (38 %). Through an examination of perceptions about specific responsibilities of advisors and mentors, faculty members provide a description of their culture and the expectations they have about themselves and others. One would expect that because mentoring requires additional time and involvement that faculty would report differences between advising and mentoring. However, faculty members perceive few differences between advisors and mentors. We examine the implications of these findings. Future scientists need to be confident their education includes the opportunity to acquire the best possible research skills. To develop advisors who have the ability to provide this training, the process begins by defining role expectations and responsibilities and preparing advisors to interact with doctoral students in ways comparable to mentors. We expect faculty members to know how to teach and how to mentor; yet, we rarely discuss how to develop and shape the necessary skills of advisors so, that they more closely resemble those of mentors
Keywords Mentor  Advisor  Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR)  Faculty roles  PhD education  Institutional role to promote integrity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-012-9366-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Case for a Duty to Feed the Hungry: GM Plants and the Third World.Lucy Carter - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):69-82.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Group Mentoring to Foster the Responsible Conduct of Research.Caroline Whitebeck - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4):541-558.
The Myth of the Moral Faculty: Response to Kirkby.Mark Johnson - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology (4):1-5.
The Ethics of Mentoring.Dennis J. Moberg & Manuel Velasquez - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (1):95-122.


Added to PP index

Total views
20 ( #554,594 of 2,498,006 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,301 of 2,498,006 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes