Non-axiomatizability of Grice's implicature

Studia Logica 53 (2):343 - 349 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to test Grice's theory of conversational implication [1], so-calledimplicature, by putting it into operation in the simplest possible formal language, that is, by constructing an adequate zero-order (sentential) logic. We are going to give a recursive formal description of Grice's maxims and show that the description cannot be made finite.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Saying (Nothing) and Conversational Implicatures.Victor Tamburini - 2023 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 104 (4):816-836.
Grice's razor.Allan Hazlett - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (5):669-690.
Where Do Implicatures Come From.Rod Bertolet - 1983 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (2):181-191.
A problem about conversational implicature.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1979 - Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (1):19 - 25.
Beyond Speaker’s Meaning.Dan Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 2015 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15 (2):117-149.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
59 (#265,080)

6 months
4 (#1,005,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the logic of conscious belief.Marek Tokarz - 1990 - Studia Logica 49 (3):321 - 332.

Add more references