Mark R. Tonelli
University of Washington
Consensus is growing among ethicists and lawyers that medical decision making for incompetent patients who were previously competent should be made in accordance with that person's prior wishes and desires. Moreover, this legal and ethical preference for the substituted judgment standard has found its way into the daily practice of medicine. However, what appears on the surface to be an agreement between jurists, bioethicists, and clinicians obscures the very real differences between disciplines regarding the actual implementation of the sub stituted judgment standard. Ethicists and judges have carefully outlined how substituted judgments ought to be made and evaluated. Although differences arise, especially at the state court level, regarding the scope of the substituted judgment standard and its relation to other standards of surrogate decision making, agreement is fairly widespread on the priority of substituted judgment and on the necessity of sufficient evidence being available in order to support a particular substituted judgment.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720X.1997.tb01392.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Revising the Substituted Judgment Standard.Ralph Baergen - 1995 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 6 (1):30.
Still Troubled: In Re Martin.Rebecca Dresser - 1996 - Hastings Center Report 26 (4):21-22.
At Law: Still Troubled: In Re Martin.Rebecca Dresser - 1996 - Hastings Center Report 26 (4):21.
On Taking Substituted Judgment Seriously.Charles Baron - 1990 - Hastings Center Report 20 (5):7-8.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Determining Proxy Consent.Richard O'Neil - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):389-403.
Living Wills and Substituted Judgments: A Critical Analysis.Jos V. M. Welie - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):169-183.
Pleasure in Medical Practice.Jean-Christophe Weber - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):153-164.
Mad Belief?Eric Schwitzgebel - 2012 - Neuroethics 5 (1):13-17.


Added to PP index

Total views
50 ( #228,637 of 2,519,807 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,314 of 2,519,807 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes