Mousetraps and How to Avoid Them: The Convergence of Utilitarian and Scientific Cases for Limiting the Mouse Model in Biomedical Research

Between the Species 15 (1):5 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The primary aim of biomedical research is to discover and develop new knowledge to advance human medicine. Frequently a ‘mouse model’ is taken to be a necessary step towards understanding a disease, biological mechanism or intervention. We argue for caution with respect to the mouse model: theoretical reasons, meta-analyses of empirical data, and viable alternatives all support a more restricted use of animals in laboratories than is current practice. On its own terms, a utilitarian scientific justification for using animals in biomedical research converges more closely with welfarist claims than is usually recognised

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,400

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The dilemma of dual use biological research: Polish perspective.Marek Czarkowski - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):99-110.
Util-izing animals.Hugh Lafollette & Niall Shanks - 1995 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):13-25.
Descriptive inner model theory.Grigor Sargsyan - 2013 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 19 (1):1-55.
Limits of Autonomy in Biomedical Ethics? Conceptual Clarifications.Theda Rehbock - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4):524-532.
The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research.Jan Winter & Laszlo Kosolosky - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):757-774.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-28

Downloads
12 (#806,220)

6 months
1 (#452,962)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cynthia Townley
Macquarie University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
Animal Liberation.Bill Puka & Peter Singer - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (4):557.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - Human Studies 8 (4):389-392.

View all 10 references / Add more references