Treating fetuses: The patient as person [Book Review]

Journal of Medical Humanities 12 (4):173-181 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The medical treatment in utero of human beings raises several ethical questions. I argue that treatment is sufficient to establish the fetus as person; and consider how conflicts between the interests of the fetus and mother are to be resolved when such treatment is proposed. My arguments rest upon a ‘relational model’ of ethical discourse derived from H. Richard Niebuhr's “ethics of the fitting.”I conclude that the limitation of personal autonomy is rarely justified, but may be when direct, grave, harm to others is imminent; and that educative rather than punitive measures are the best prospect for protecting fetal life

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Informed consent and justified hard paternalism.Emma Cecelia Bullock - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Birmingham
Just dying: the futility of futility.Julian Savulescu - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):583-584.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-23

Downloads
4 (#1,013,551)

6 months
9 (#1,260,759)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The responsible self.Helmut Richard Niebuhr - 1963 - New York,: Harper & Row.
At Law: Pregnant Women as Fetal Containers.George J. Annas - 1986 - Hastings Center Report 16 (6):13.
A New Threat to Pregnant Women's Autonomy.Dawn Johnsen - 1987 - Hastings Center Report 17 (4):33-40.
Genug ist Genug: A Fetus Is Not a Kidney.Kathleen Nolan - 1988 - Hastings Center Report 18 (6):13-19.

View all 6 references / Add more references