Holding civic medicine accountable: Will Morreim's liability scheme work in a disaster?

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (3):339 – 357 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Holding Health Care Accountable , E. Haavi Morreim differentiates between duties of expertise and resource duties, arguing for tort liability respecting the former and contract liability respecting the latter. Though Morreim's book addresses ordinary clinical medicine, her liability scheme may also be relevant elsewhere. Focusing on disaster medicine, and especially the medical management of violent mass disasters (e.g., where terrorists have deployed weapons of mass destruction), I argue in this essay that Morreim's classification of duties still fits, but that it is difficult to hold government powers accountable for their many resource and expertise duties. This difficulty is compounded by political arrangements that foist under-funded mandates for disaster services on healthcare providers. As a result of such arrangements, hospitals and clinicians are prone to liability for expenditures and clinical interventions that are beyond their scope. This problem can be mitigated, I argue, by examining and clarifying the apparent social compact between society and healthcare.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#294,356)

6 months
1 (#1,462,504)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Tinkering with the Survival Lottery during a Public Health Crisis.C. Herrera - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (2):181-194.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references