Journal of Business Ethics 159 (1):201-219 (2019)

Abstract
This paper provides an exploration of whistleblowing as a protracted process, using secondary data from 868 cases from a whistleblower advice line in the UK. Previous research on whistleblowing has mainly studied this phenomenon as a one-off decision by someone perceiving wrongdoing within an organisation to raise a concern or to remain silent. Earlier suggestions that whistleblowing is a process and that people find themselves inadvertently turned into whistleblowers by management responses, have not been followed up by a systematic study tracking the path of how a concern is repeatedly raised by whistleblowers. This paper provides a quantitative exploration of whistleblowing as a protracted process, rather than a one-off decision. Our research finds that the whistleblowing process generally entails two or even three internal attempts to raise a concern before an external attempt is made, if it is made at all. We also find that it is necessary to distinguish further between different internal as well as external whistleblowing recipients. Our findings suggest that whistleblowing is a protracted process and that this process is internally more protracted than previously documented. The overall pattern is that whistleblowers tend to search for a more independent recipient at each successive attempt to raise their concern. Formal whistleblower power seems to determine which of the available recipients are perceived as viable and also what the initial responses are in terms of retaliation and effectiveness.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-017-3727-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Politicisation of Whistleblowers: A Case Study.Tina Uys - 2000 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 9 (4):259-267.
The Politicisation of Whistleblowers: A Case Study.Tina Uys - 2000 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 9 (4):259–267.
The Voice of Experience.Robert L. Sprague - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):33-44.
Whistleblowing and Media Logic: A Case Study.Gerard Smit Robert Es - 2003 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 12 (2):144-150.
Rewarding Whistleblowers: A Conceptual Problem?Michael Davis - 2012 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):269-277.
Reconceptualising Whistleblowing in a Complex World.Julio A. Andrade - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 128 (2):321-335.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-11-04

Total views
41 ( #276,474 of 2,506,179 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,069 of 2,506,179 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes