Rawls on Liberty and Domination

Res Publica 15 (4):397-413 (2009)
Abstract
One of the central elements of John Rawls’ argument in support of his two principles of justice is the intuitive normative ideal of citizens as free and equal. But taken in isolation, the claim that citizens are to be treated as free and equal is extremely indeterminate, and has virtually no clear implications for policy. In order to remedy this, the two principles of justice, together with the stipulation that citizens have basic interests in developing their moral capacities and pursuing their conceptions of the good life, are meant to provide a more precise interpretation of what is involved in treating citizens as free and equal. Rawls’ critics, however, have argued that satisfying the two principles of justice is not the most appropriate or plausible way to respect the status of citizens as free and equal. In relation to this debate, the present paper has two aims. The first is to examine Rawls’ account of the type of freedom that a just society must guarantee equally to its citizens. I will argue that those who think of Rawls as a theorist of freedom as non-interference are mistaken, because his notion of liberty resembles in important respects the republican notion of freedom as non-domination. Second, I will consider the extent to which Rawls’ principles of justice successfully protect the freedom as non-domination of all citizens so as to effectively treat them as free and equal
Keywords Rawls  Liberty  Domination  Pettit  Interference  Freedom
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-009-9102-6
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,727
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.John Rawls - 2001 - Harvard University Press.
The Law of Peoples.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Collected Papers.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
"The Law of Peoples: With" The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,".John Rawls - 2002 - Philosophy East and West 52 (3):396-396.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity.Richard J. Arneson - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 93 (1):77-112.
The Place of Self-Respect in a Theory of Justice.Gerald Doppelt - 2009 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (2):127 – 154.
Fair Equality of Opportunity.Larry A. Alexander - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:197-208.
Civic Respect, Political Liberalism, and Non-Liberal Societies.Blain Neufeld - 2005 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (3):275-299.
The Impossibility of Democracy.James Hersh - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:243-249.
Added to PP index
2009-10-26

Total downloads
104 ( #50,281 of 2,197,333 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #44,170 of 2,197,333 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature