Argument and Computation 6 (3):219-245 (2016)

Authors
Fabrizio Macagno
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Douglas Walton
University of Windsor
Abstract
This paper explains the importance of classifying argumentation schemes, and outlines how schemes are being used in current research in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics on argument mining. It provides a survey of the literature on scheme classification. What are so far generally taken to represent a set of the most widely useful defeasible argumentation schemes are surveyed and explained systematically, including some that are difficult to classify. A new classification system covering these centrally important schemes is built.
Keywords Artificial intelligence  Argument mining  argument  Interpretation  Pragmatics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/19462166.2015.1123772
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Similarity, Precedent and Argument From Analogy.Douglas Walton - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (3):217-246.
Supporting Argumentation Schemes in Argumentative Dialogue Games.Simon Wells - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):171-191.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-05-22

Total views
24 ( #407,629 of 2,329,884 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #35,184 of 2,329,884 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes