- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Through the Community Looking Glass: Reevaluating the Ethical and Policy Implications of Research on Adolescent Risk and Psychopathology
Ethics and Behavior 10 (2):99-118 (2000)
Abstract
Drawing on a conception of scientists and community members as partners in the construction of ethically responsible research practices, this article urges investigators to seek the perspectives of teenagers and parents in evaluating the personal and political costs and benefits of research on adolescent risk behaviors. Content analysis of focus group discussions involving over 100 parents and teenagers from diverse ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds revealed community opinions regarding the scientific merit, social value, racial bias, and participant and group harms and benefits associated with surveys, informant reports, intervention studies, blood sampling, and genetic research on youth problems. Participant comments highlight new directions for socially responsible research.My notes
Similar books and articles
Adolescent and Parent Perspectives on Ethical Issues in Youth Drug Use and Suicide Survey Research.Celia B. Fisher - 2003 - Ethics and Behavior 13 (4):303-332.
Wrestling with Public Input on an Ethical Analysis of Scientific Research.Erik Parens, Michelle N. Meyer, Patrick Turley, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Nanibaa’ A. Garrison, Shawneequa L. Callier & Daphne Oluwaseun Martschenko - 2023 - Hastings Center Report 53 (2):S50-S65.
‘Ethical responsibility’ or ‘a whole can of worms’: differences in opinion on incidental finding review and disclosure in neuroimaging research from focus group discussions with participants, parents, IRB members, investigators, physicians and community members.Caitlin Cole, Linda E. Petree, John P. Phillips, Jody M. Shoemaker, Mark Holdsworth & Deborah L. Helitzer - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (10):841-847.
Ethical considerations for involving adolescents in biomedical HIV prevention research.Andrew Mujugira, Kenneth Ngure, Juliet Allen Babirye, Joel Maena, Joselyne Nansimbe, Simon Afrika Akasiima, Hadijah Kalule Nabunya, Florence Biira, Emmie Mulumba, Maria Janine Nambusi, Stella Nanyonga, Sophie C. Nanziri, Doreen Kemigisha, Teopista Nakyanzi, Juliane Etima, Betty Kamira, Monica Nolan, Clemensia Nakabiito, Brenda Gati, Carolyne Akello & Rita Nakalega - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-7.
Deception research involving children: Ethical practices and paradoxes.Celia B. Fisher - 2005 - Ethics and Behavior 15 (3):271 – 287.
Ethical Responsibilities and Perceptions of Stakeholders of Genetic Research Involving Racial/Ethnic Minority Participants.Emmanuel M. Ngui, Teddy D. Warner & Laura Weiss Roberts - 2015 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 6 (3):15-27.
Wrestling with Social and Behavioral Genomics: Risks, Potential Benefits, and Ethical Responsibility.Michelle N. Meyer, Paul S. Appelbaum, Daniel J. Benjamin, Shawneequa L. Callier, Nathaniel Comfort, Dalton Conley, Jeremy Freese, Nanibaa' A. Garrison, Evelynn M. Hammonds, K. Paige Harden, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Alicia R. Martin, Daphne Oluwaseun Martschenko, Benjamin M. Neale, Rohan H. C. Palmer, James Tabery, Eric Turkheimer, Patrick Turley & Erik Parens - 2023 - Hastings Center Report 53 (S1):2-49.
The ethics of risk displacement in research and public policy.Gerard Vong & Meira Levinson - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (9):918-922.
Reporting and referring research participants: Ethical challenges for investigators studying children and youth.Celia B. Fisher - 1994 - Ethics and Behavior 4 (2):87 – 95.
‘We are the eyes and ears of researchers and community’: Understanding the role of community advisory groups in representing researchers and communities in Malawi.Deborah Nyirenda, Salla Sariola, Kate Gooding, Mackwellings Phiri, Rodrick Sambakunsi, Elvis Moyo, Chiwoza Bandawe, Bertie Squire & Nicola Desmond - 2017 - Developing World Bioethics 18 (4):420-428.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
32 (#516,416)
6 months
7 (#491,177)
2009-01-28
Downloads
32 (#516,416)
6 months
7 (#491,177)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Reducing Health Disparities and Enhancing the Responsible Conduct of Research Involving LGBT Youth.Celia B. Fisher & Brian Mustanski - 2014 - Hastings Center Report 44 (s4):28-31.
Enhancing the Responsible Conduct of Sexual Health Prevention Research Across Global and Local Contexts: Training for Evidence-Based Research Ethics.Celia B. Fisher - 2015 - Ethics and Behavior 25 (2):87-96.
Adolescent and Parent Perspectives on Ethical Issues in Youth Drug Use and Suicide Survey Research.Celia B. Fisher - 2003 - Ethics and Behavior 13 (4):303-332.
Peruvian Female Sex Workers’ Ethical Perspectives on Their Participation in an HPV Vaccine Clinical Trial.Brandon Brown, Mariam Davtyan & Celia B. Fisher - 2015 - Ethics and Behavior 25 (2):115-128.
References found in this work
Scientific value and validity as ethical requirements for research: a proposed explication.Benjamin Freedman - 1987 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 9 (6):7.
Relational ethics and research with vulnerable populations.Celia B. Fisher - 1999 - Reports on Research Involving Persons with Mental Disorders That May Affect Decision-Making Capacity 2:29-49.
What Patients Say about Medical Research.Jeremy Sugarman, Nancy E. Kass, Steven N. Goodman, Patricia Perentesis, Praveen Fernandes & Ruth R. Faden - 1998 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 20 (4):1.
A Relational Perspective on Ethics-in-Science Decisionmaking for Research with Vulnerable Populations.Celia B. Fisher - 1997 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 19 (5):1.
Exclusion and emphasis reframed as a matter of ethics.Jessica Henderson Daniel - 1994 - Ethics and Behavior 4 (3):229 – 235.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-x7cz5 uwo