Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3-4):183-221 (1995)

Michael Wedin
University of California, Davis
This paper considers I) whether Aristotle's notion of form is 'compositionally plastic' and II) whether matter is in any way to be included in the form of natural things. It pursues (I) and (II) with respect to two texts only: De Anima I-2's socalled definition of anger and the notorious young Socrates passage from Metaphysics VII.11. Neither passage supports indusion of anything material in the form and both are consistent with compositional plasticity. To thus extent the support what I call the purification of form
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,657
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Content and Cause in the Aristotelian Mind.Michael V. Wedin - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (S1):49-105.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
41 ( #266,860 of 2,462,334 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,152 of 2,462,334 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes