Dialogue 46 (3):481-500 (2007)

Authors
Ruth Weintraub
Tel Aviv University
Abstract
ABSTRACT: According to the received view, Hume is a much more rigorous and consistent concept-empiricist than Locke. Hume is supposed to have taken as a starting point Locke’s meaning-empiricism, and worked out its full radical implicalions. Locke, by way of contrast, cowered from drawing his theory’s strange consequences. The received view about Locke’s and Hume’s concept-empiricism is mistaken, I shall argue. Hume may be more uncompromising, but he is not more rigorous than Locke. It is not because of timidity that Locke does not draw Hume’s conclusions from his empiricism. It is, rather, because of his much sounder method.RÉSUMÉ: Selon l’opinion génerale, Hume est un empiriciste conceptuel beaucoup plus rigoureux et consistent que Locke. On croit que Hume a pris l’empiricisme des significations de Locke comme son point de depart et puis élabore toutes ses implifications radicales -- et que Locke, au contraire, se retire et évite de tirer les etranges conséquences de sa théorie. Je veux soutenir que l’opinion acceptée sur l’empiricisme conceptuel de Locke et Hume est en erreur. Hume est peut-être plus décidé mais il n’est pas plus rigoureux que Locke. Si Locke ne tire pas les conclusions d’Hume de son empiricisme ce n’est pas a cause de sa timidite. Plutôt, il le fait grace a sa methode beaucoup mieux fondée.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0012-2173
DOI dialogue200746322
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,205
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Separability and Concept-Empiricism: Hume Vs. Locke.Ruth Weintraub - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (4):729 – 743.
Hume’s Nominalism and the Copy Principle.Ruth Weintraub - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (S1):45-54.
So Forward to Imagine.Timothy M. Costelloe - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:117-122.
The Moral Sciences of John Locke and David Hume.Scott Edward Yenor - 2000 - Dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago
Locke, Berkeley, Hume; Central Themes.Jonathan Bennett - 1971 - Oxford University Press UK.
Locke, Berkeley, Hume.C. R. Morris - 1931 - Greenwood Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-15

Total views
12 ( #780,937 of 2,444,699 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,256 of 2,444,699 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes