Comparative Philosophy 2 (2):50 (2011)

Mario Wenning
Loyola University Andalusia
Classical philosophical Daoism as it is expressed in the Dao-De-Jing and the Zhuang-Zi is often interpreted as lacking a capacity for critique and resistance. Since these capacities are taken to be central components of Enlightenment reason and action, it would follow that Daoism is incompatible with Enlightenment. This interpretation is being refuted by way of developing a constructive dialogue between the enlightenment traditions of critical theory and recent philosophy of action from a Daoist perspective. Daoism's normative naturalism does neither rest on a primitivist call for a return to the past, nor does it suggest future-directed activism. By way of reconstructing its descriptive, explanatory and emancipatory dimensions, it is shown that Daoism constitutes an alternative form of critical theory. In contrast to future-directed purposive action or blind rule-following, Daoism's key normative concept of "wu-wei" emphasizes effortless non-calculative responsiveness in the present. Drawing on recent insights in the philosophy of action, a reconstruction of wu-wei allows to conceive of a promising form of emancipatory agency
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,089
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Intention.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1957 - Harvard University Press.
Mind and World.Huw Price & John McDowell - 1994 - Philosophical Books 38 (3):169-181.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Dialectics of Enlightenment, East and West.Mario Wenning - 2017 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 44 (3-4):251-274.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Universal Sentiment of Daoist Morality.Jianliang Xu - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):524-536.
The Limit of Language in Daoism.Koji Tanaka - 2004 - Asian Philosophy 14 (2):191 – 205.
Typology of Nothing: Heidegger, Daoism and Buddhism.Zhihua Yao - 2010 - Comparative Philosophy 1 (1):78-89.
Daoism and the Later Merleau-Ponty on Body.Wing-Cheuk Chan - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 51:3-9.


Added to PP index

Total views
47 ( #239,071 of 2,499,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,823 of 2,499,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes