Disability, discrimination and death: is it justified to ration life saving treatment for disabled newborn infants?

Monash Bioethics Review 32 (1-2):43-62 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Disability might be relevant to decisions about life support in intensive care in several ways. It might affect the chance of treatment being successful, or a patient’s life expectancy with treatment. It may affect whether treatment is in a patient’s best interests. However, even if treatment would be of overall benefit it may be unaffordable and consequently unable to be provided. In this paper we will draw on the example of neonatal intensive care, and ask whether or when it is justified to ration life-saving treatment on the basis of disability. We argue that predicted disability is relevant both indirectly and directly to rationing decisions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-28

Downloads
40 (#347,838)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Julian Savulescu
Oxford University
Dominic Wilkinson
Oxford University

References found in this work

Nicomachean ethics.H. Aristotle & Rackham - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Michael Pakaluk.
Nicomachean Ethics.Terence Irwin & Aristotle of Stagira - 1999 - Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Should the numbers count?John Taurek - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):293-316.
Discrimination.Andrew Altman - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
QALYfying the value of life.J. Harris - 1987 - Journal of Medical Ethics 13 (3):117-123.

View all 24 references / Add more references