Intuitionism Disproved?

Analysis 42 (4):203--7 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Perennial philosophers' hopes are unlikely victims of swift, natural deduction. Yet anti-realism has been thought one. Not hoping for anti-realism myself I here show it, lest it be underestimated, to survive the following argument, adapted from W. D.Hart pp. 156, 164-5; he credits first publication to Fitch)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

``Intuitionism Disproved".Timothy Williamson - 1982 - Analysis 42:203-207.
Knowability and Constructivism.Timothy Williamson - 1988 - Philosophical Quarterly 38 (53):422-432.
Putnam’s no Miracles Argument.Marco Bastianelli - 2021 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 13 (2).
Metaphysics, Philosophy, and the Philosophy of Language.Michael Morris - 1997 - In Bob Hale, Crispin Wright & Alexander Miller (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 1–26.
The Anti-Induction for Scientific Realism.Seungbae Park - 2018 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 95 (3):329-342.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-20

Downloads
271 (#77,403)

6 months
13 (#277,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Fitch's proof, verificationism, and the knower paradox.J. C. Beall - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (2):241 – 247.
Intuitionistic epistemic logic.Sergei Artemov & Tudor Protopopescu - 2016 - Review of Symbolic Logic 9 (2):266-298.

View all 53 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references