Pensamiento 67 (254):617-630 (2011)
Paradoxically, explorers of the territory of consciousness seem to be studying consciousness out of existence, from inside the field of "consciousness studies". How? Through their love of the phenomenon/process, they have developed powerful single models or lenses through which to understand consciousness. But in doing so, they also seek to destroy the other /equally useful/ lenses. Our opportunity lies in halting the vendettas and cross-speakings/cross-fire. The imploration is to stop the dichotomous thinking and pernicious reification of single models, and instead search for divisions of labor, complementarities, and legitimate redescriptions among the various extant models. In other words, what would happen if we reimagined the conceptual classifications of the various models of consciousness, classifications based on general philosophical dichotomies (e.g., representational/non-representational and individualist/non-individualist), as a variety of compatible and even complementary perspectives on the same complex phenomenon and process? What would happen if rather than dig in our heels vis-à-vis our favorite theory of consciousness, at the exclusion of all the others, we saw our perceived enemy as an actual, indeed necessary, friend-in-waiting? What would it take to see a battlefield as a collaborative opportunity, to see a promising pluralism rather than an endless state space of conflict?
|Keywords||Consciousness Embodied cognition Network theory Tacit knowledge Computational theory of mind Language of thought|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Contemporary Models of Consciousness, Part II.Jean E. Burns - 1991 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 12 (3):407-420.
Process Approaches to Consciousness in Psychology, Neuroscience, and Philosophy of Mind.Michel Weber & Anderson Weekes (eds.) - 2010 - Albany: State University of New York Press.
The Future of a Discipline: Considering the Ontological/Methodological Future of the Anthropology of Consciousness, Part III.Rafael G. Locke - 2011 - Anthropology of Consciousness 22 (2):106-135.
Consciousness: Mapping the Theoretical Landscape.Anthony P. Atkinson, Michael S. C. Thomas & Axel Cleeremans - 2000 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (10):372-382.
Contemporary Models of Consciousness, Part I.Jean E. Burns - 1990 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 11 (2):153-171.
Is 'Consciousness' Ambiguous?Michael V. Antony - 2001 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (2):19-44.
The Limits of Neuropsychological Models of Consciousness.Max Velmans - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):702-703.
Self-Representational Approaches to Consciousness.Uriah Kriegel & Kenneth W. Williford (eds.) - 2006 - MIT Press.
Phenomenal Consciousness and Self-Awareness: A Phenomenological Critique of Representational Theory.Josef Parnas & Dan Zahavi - 1998 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 5 (5-6):687-705.
Consciousness-Based Education: A Foundation for Teaching and Learning in the Academic Disciplines.Dara Llewellyn & Craig Pearson (eds.) - 2011 - Consciousness-Based Books, an Imprint of Maharishi University of Management Press.
Added to index2012-01-19
Total downloads428 ( #5,380 of 2,172,876 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #15,515 of 2,172,876 )
How can I increase my downloads?