Theories of Fairness and Aggregation

Erkenntnis:1-24 (forthcoming)

Authors
Stefan Wintein
Tilburg University
Conrad Heilmann
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Abstract
We investigate the issue of aggregativity in fair division problems from the perspective of cooperative game theory and Broomean theories of fairness. Paseau and Saunders proved that no non-trivial theory of fairness can be aggregative and conclude that theories of fairness are therefore problematic, or at least incomplete. We observe that there are theories of fairness, particularly those that are based on cooperative game theory, that do not face the problem of non-aggregativity. We use this observation to argue that the universal claim that no non-trivial theory of fairness can guarantee aggregativity is false. Paseau and Saunders’s mistaken assertion can be understood as arising from a neglect of the games approach to fair division. Our treatment has two further pay-offs: for one, we give an accessible introduction to the games approach to fair division, whose significance has hitherto not been appreciated by philosophers working on fairness. For another, our discussion explores the issue of aggregativity in fair division problems in a comprehensive fashion.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10670-018-0045-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,327
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Treating Broome Fairly.Christian Piller - 2017 - Utilitas 29 (2):214-238.
Fairness.Brad Hooker - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (4):329 - 352.
Fairness.John Broome - 1990 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91:87 - 101.
V—Fairness.John Broome - 1991 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91 (1):87-102.
On Fairness and Claims.Patrick Tomlin - 2012 - Utilitas 24 (2):200-213.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Fairness and Aggregation.A. C. Paseau & Ben Saunders - 2015 - Utilitas 27 (4):460-469.
How to Be Fairer.Conrad Heilmann & Stefan Wintein - 2017 - Synthese 194 (9):3475-3499.
On Fairness and Claims.Patrick Tomlin - 2012 - Utilitas 24 (2):200-213.
Family Fairness.Edna Ullmann-Margalit - 2006 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 73 (2):575-596.
Disagreement About Fairness.Christopher McMahon - 2010 - Philosophical Topics 38 (2):91-110.
A Theory of Fairness in Trade.Aaron James - 2014 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 1 (2):177-200.
To Be Fair.Benjamin L. Curtis - 2014 - Analysis 74 (1):47-57.
How Fair Is Actuarial Fairness?Xavier Landes - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 128 (3):519-533.
Fairness, Political Obligation, and the Justificatory Gap.Jiafeng Zhu - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy (4):1-23.
Explaining Fairness in Complex Environments.Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (1):81-97.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-07-26

Total views
16 ( #529,847 of 2,271,522 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #330,411 of 2,271,522 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature