What's Wrong with Zeno


There was a time in my school years when I have learned about Achilles and Tortoise “paradox” originated from Zeno. It was then clear that the ancient Greeks were arguing about this problem but contemporary science has clarified the issue. Yet to my surprise the problem is still debated over and over, despite the fact there exist mathematical proofs. I feel like reminding myself why this is not a paradox beyond reasonable doubt. This is a draft to a section of a future publication



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Defending transitivity against zeno’s paradox.Ken Binmore & Alex Voorhoeve - 2003 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (3):272–279.
Another Look at Some of Zeno's Paradoxes.Flash qFiasco - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):119 - 130.
Zeno's Paradoxes on Motion.John O. Nelson - 1963 - Review of Metaphysics 16 (3):486 - 490.
Aquiles, la Tortuga y el infinito.José Enrique García Pascua - 2003 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 28 (2):215-236.
Why Achilles Need Not Catch the Tortoise.Takuo Aoyama - 2010 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 43 (2):81-94.
Zeno's metrical paradox revisited.David M. Sherry - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (1):58-73.
Achilles, the Tortoise, and Colliding Balls.Jeanne Peijnenburg & David Atkinson - 2008 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 25 (3):187 - 201.
What the liar taught Achilles.Gary Mar & Paul St Denis - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):29-46.
Was Zeno right?Peter Zinkernagel - 1965 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):292 – 300.


Added to PP

250 (#59,235)

6 months
52 (#39,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references