Rhetoric and Public Reasoning

Political Theory 34 (4):417-438 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay asks why Aristotle, certainly no friend to unlimited democracy, seems so much more comfortable with unconstrained rhetoric in political deliberation than current defenders of deliberative democracy. It answers this question by reconstructing and defending a distinctly Aristotelian understanding of political deliberation, one that can be pieced together out of a series of separate arguments made in the Rhetoric, the Politics, and the Nicomachean Ethics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
64 (#246,164)

6 months
24 (#148,771)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bernard Yack
Brandeis University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references