Conditional and habitual analyses of disposition ascriptions

Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):624-630 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Michael Fara's ‘habitual analysis’ of disposition ascriptions is equivalent to a kind of ceteris paribus conditional analysis which has no evident advantage over Martin's well known and simpler analysis. I describe an unsatisfactory hypothetical response to Martin's challenge, which is lacking in just the same respect as the analysis considered by Martin; Fara's habitual analysis is equivalent to this hypothetical analysis. The feature of the habitual analysis that is responsible for this cannot be harmlessly excised, for the resulting analysis would be subject to familiar counter-examples

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-01-23

Downloads
601 (#15,106)

6 months
38 (#28,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Dispositions and Conditionals.C. B. Martin - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (174):1-8.
Dispositions and Antidotes.Alexander Bird - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (191):227-234.

Add more references