Miracles and Credibility

Religious Studies 16 (4):465 - 468 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

IN THIS PAPER I RESPOND TO SEVERAL OBJECTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN MOUNTED TO MY THEORY OF THE MIRACULOUS. IN PARTICULAR I ARGUE THAT ON MY THEORY A MIRACLE IS DECIDEDLY NOT AN EVENT WHICH IS NATURALLY EXPLICABLE FOR "QUA" MIRACLE AN EVENT IS ONLY EXPLICABLE BY REFERENCE TO THE ACTIVITY OF A NON-NATURAL AGENT’S ALTERING THE SURROUNDING CONDITIONS IN VIRTUE OF HIS ACTIVITY IN THE WORLD

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The credibility of miracles.Ruth Weintraub - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 82 (3):359 - 375.
Miracles and scientific explanation.Margaret A. Boden - 1969 - Ratio (Misc.) 11:137 - 144.
Miracles and coincidences.Ian Walker - 1983 - Sophia 22 (3):29-36.
Miracles as evidence against the existence of God.Christine Overall - 1985 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):347-353.
Mr Young on Miracles.Tan Tai Wei - 1974 - Religious Studies 10 (3):333 - 337.
Miracles and criteria.Robert Larmer - 1984 - Sophia 23 (1):5 - 12.
Miracles.J. Kellenberger - 1979 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (3):145 - 162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
18 (#828,105)

6 months
6 (#507,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references