What can we learn from the absence of evidence?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):133-134 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Heyes discounts findings of imitation and self recognition in nonhuman primates based on flimsy speculation and then indicates that even positive findings would not provide evidence of theory of mind. Her proposed experiment is unlikely to work, however, because, even if the animals have a theory of mind, a number of assumptions, not directly related to theory of mind, must be made about their reasoning ability.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theory of mind in nonhuman primates.C. M. Heyes - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):101-114.
Theory of mind in nonhuman primates: A question of language?Colin Gray & Phil Russell - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):121-121.
The prior question: Do human primates have a theory of mind?Robert M. Gordon - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):120-121.
Primate theory of mind is a Turing test.Robert W. Mitchell & James R. Anderson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):127-128.
Tactics in theory of mind research.Jesse E. Purdy & Michael Domjan - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):129-130.
Primate cognitive neuroscience: What are the useful questions?A. Parker - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):128-128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
21 (#762,344)

6 months
8 (#415,167)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references