What to do about peer review: Is the cure worse than the disease?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):166-167 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Modernism: Cure or disease? [REVIEW]Frederick Turner - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (2):169-180.
A cure for aging?Timothy F. Murphy - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (3):237-255.
The principles and practices of Peer review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
The eleatic hangover cure.Josh Parsons - 2004 - Analysis 64 (4):364–366.
'Peer review' culture.Dr Malcolm Atkinson - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):193-204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
23 (#661,981)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations.Robert King Merton - 1973 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Norman W. Storer.

View all 46 references / Add more references