Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Was Adam Smith an individualist?Andy Denis - 1999 - History of the Human Sciences 12 (3):71-86.
    Smith is generally regarded as an individualist without qualification. This paper argues that his predominantly individualist policy prescription is rooted in a more complex philosophy. He sees nature, including human nature, as a vast machine supervised by God and designed to maximise human happiness. Human weaknesses, as well as strengths, display the wisdom of God and play their part in this scheme. While Smith pays lip service to justice, it is really social order that pre-occupies him, and within that, the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Epistemology, observed particulars and providentialist assumptions: The fact in the history of political economy.Andy Denis - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):353-361.
  • Was Hayek a panglossian evolutionary theorist? A Reply to Whitman.Andy Denis - 2002 - Constitutional Political Economy 13 (3):275-285.
    By means of a consideration of Whitman (1998) the present paper considers the meanings of ‘Panglossianism’ and the relation between group and individual levels in evolution. It establishes the connection between the Panglossian policy prescription of laissez-faire and the mistaken evolutionary theory of group selection. Analysis of the passages in Hayek cited by Whitman shows that, once these passages are taken in context, and once the appropriate meaning of the term ‘Panglossian’ has been clarified, they fail to defend Hayek from (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Manifesto of the communist party.Karl Marx - unknown