10 found
Order:
  1.  21
    Essays on Euripidean Drama. [REVIEW]G. A. Longman & Gilbert Norwood - 1957 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 77 (2):324-325.
  2.  42
    A Concordance to Euripides. By J. T. Allen and G. Italie. Pp. Xi + 686. Berkeley & Los Angeles: California University Press , 1954. £3 15s. [REVIEW]G. A. Longman - 1956 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 76:114-115.
  3.  9
    Gnomologium Vatopedianum: The Euripidean Section.G. A. Longman - 1959 - Classical Quarterly 9 (3-4):129-.
    Spranger's Preliminary Skeleton List of the Manuscripts of Euripides mentions four gnomological manuscripts:The first and the third of these manuscripts contain miscellaneous excerpts of many classical and scriptural authors, arranged under various subject headings; though some of the excerpts are Euripidean, these manuscripts have no more right to be classified as Euripidean than have the manuscripts of Orion or Stobaeus. They are, therefore, wrongly included in Spranger's list.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  20
    Aeschylus, Choephori 926.G. A. Longman - 1954 - The Classical Review 4 (02):86-90.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  19
    Aeschylus, P.V. 428–30.G. A. Longman - 1952 - The Classical Review 2 (01):1-2.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  14
    Anth. Pal. v. 244(245). 3.G. A. Longman - 1955 - The Classical Review 5 (01):19-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  25
    Euripidean Interpolations. [REVIEW]G. A. Longman - 1958 - The Classical Review 8 (2):121-122.
  8.  19
    Sophocles, Electra 1478.G. A. Longman - 1954 - The Classical Review 4 (3-4):192-194.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  11
    The Musical Papyrus: Euripides, Orestes 332–40.G. A. Longman - 1962 - Classical Quarterly 12 (01):61-.
    The version given above is from Murray's Oxford text: the recent Budé text of Chapouthier concurs in accepting Kirchhoff's transposition. Other editors, such as Paley and Weil, have also given their approval to this proposed alteration, though Biehl regards it as superfluous. Most commentators are agreed, however, in considering that the choice must lie between the traditional line-order and Kirchhoff's transposition: few regard the papyrus line-order as either probable or even possible.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  24
    Timotheus, Persae 162.G. A. Longman - 1954 - The Classical Review 4 (3-4):208-209.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark