9 found
Order:
  1. A Note on Families Included in the Field of a Relation.J. A. Chadwick - 1928 - Mind 37 (146):260-261.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  83
    Singular Propositions.J. A. Chadwick - 1928 - Mind 37 (148):471-484.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  60
    On Propositions Belonging to Logic.--II.J. A. Chadwick - 1927 - Mind 36 (143):347-353.
  4.  59
    Logical Constants.J. A. Chadwick - 1927 - Mind 36 (141):1-11.
    There is as yet no settled consensus as to what makes a term a logical constant or even as to which terms should be recognized as having this status. This essay sets out and defends a rationale for identifying logical constants. I argue for a two-tiered approach to logical theory. First, a secure, core logical theory recognizes only a minimal set of constants needed for deductively systematizing scientific theories. Second, there are extended logical theories whose objectives are to systematize various (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  13
    A Note on Classification of Maximal Systems and Their Subsystems.J. A. Chadwick - 1929 - Mind 38 (152):533-534.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  4
    Critical Notices.J. A. Chadwick - 1925 - Mind 34 (134):224-230.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  3
    A Correction: A Note on Families Included in the Field of a Relation.J. A. Chadwick - 1928 - Mind 37 (147):392.
    On p. 261 of MIND, No. 146 (April, 1928), the relation expressed by the words “is a itbfamily of” would be better expressed by some other phrase such as “is a subsystem of”. For the notion which I defined at the end of the note was, through a stupid mistake on my part, incorrectly described as “a family,” whereas really it should hare received some quite distinct designation such as “a maximal system”. The term “family” should of course be used (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  3
    A Correction.J. A. Chadwick - 1928 - Mind 37 (147):392-s-392.
    On p. 261 of MIND, No. 146 (April, 1928), the relation expressed by the words “is a itbfamily of” would be better expressed by some other phrase such as “is a subsystem of”. For the notion which I defined at the end of the note was, through a stupid mistake on my part, incorrectly described as “a family,” whereas really it should hare received some quite distinct designation such as “a maximal system”. The term “family” should of course be used (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. RITCHIE, A. D. - Scientific Method. [REVIEW]J. A. Chadwick - 1925 - Mind 34:224.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography