9 found
Order:
Disambiguations
M. A. van Rees [10]M. Agnès van Rees [4]
  1.  11
    Within Pragma-Dialectics: Comments on Bonevac.M. A. Van Rees - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):461-464.
  2.  13
    Strategic Maneuvering with Dissociation.M. A. van Rees - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):473-487.
    This paper explores the possibilities for strategic maneuvering of the argumentative technique that Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame/London, 1969) called dissociation. After an exploration of the general possibilities that dissociation may have for enhancing critical reasonableness and rhetorical effectiveness, the use of dissociation in the successive stages of a critical discussion is examined. For each stage, first, the dialectical moves that dissociation can be employed in are specified, then, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3.  34
    Ralph H. Johnson (2000), Manifest Rationality. A Pragmatic Theory of Argument.M. A. Van Rees - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (2):231-237.
  4.  15
    The Diagnostic Power of the Stages of Critical Discussion in the Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussions.M. A. van Rees - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (4):457-470.
    In this article, the pragma-dialectical model of a critical discussion is demonstrated to provide a useful instrument for discovering causes of an unsatisfactory development of problem-solving discussions. First a sketch is given of the development of a problem-solving discussion which, in the opinion of the participants themselves, developed in an unsatisfactory fashion. Then it is argued that this development can be traced back to flaws in the execution of the stages of a critical discussion.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  38
    Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussion.M. A. van Rees - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):465-479.
    In this article, after arguing that present approaches to improving problem-solving discussions for various reasons are not satisfactory, I turn to the pragma-dialectic approach to argumentative discourse to derive a normative framework that can serve as a point of departure to enhance the quality of problem-solving discussions. I then show how this approach can be used as analytical and evaluative instrument that can help the analyst to establish whether participants in actual practice act in a fashion that is in accord (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  17
    Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Twenty-First Century'.M. A. van Rees - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):255-259.
  7.  9
    Analysing and Evaluating Problem-Solving Discussions.M. Agnes Van Rees - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (2):343-362.
    In this article, the conceptual instrument that pragma-dialectical argumentation theory offers is elaborated for the analysis and evaluation of problem-solving discussions. The elaboration is aimed expressly at taking into account the discussion character of the discourse, in order to show how the developing process evolves and what the obstacles are therein. In addition, it focuses expressly on the verbal behaviour of the participants and on showing how this behaviour controls the evolving process. The analysis and evaluation is based on insights (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  15
    Accounting for Transformations in the Dialectical Reconstruction of Argumentative Discourse.M. Agnès van Rees - 1996 - In J. F. A. K. van Benthem (ed.), Logic and Argumentation. North-Holland. pp. 89.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  2
    Explaining and Arguing. The Social Arganization of Accounts.M. A. van Rees - 1995 - Argumentation 9:1-6.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark