Does written informed consent adequately inform surgical patients? A cross sectional study

BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):1 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Informed consent is an essential step in helping patients be aware of consequences of their treatment decisions. With surgery, it is vitally important for patients to understand the risks and benefits of the procedure and decide accordingly. We explored whether a written IC form was provided to patients; whether they read and signed it; whether they communicated orally with the physician; whether these communications influenced patient decisions. Adult postsurgical patients in nine general hospitals of Italy’s Campania Region were interviewed via a structured questionnaire between the second and seventh day after the surgery at the end of the first surgical follow up visit. Physicians who were independent from the surgical team administered the questionnaire. The written IC form was given to 84.5% of those interviewed. All recipients of the form signed it, either personally or through a delegate; however, 13.9% did not know/remember having done so; 51.8% said that they read it thoroughly. Of those who reported to have read it, 90.9% judged it to be clear. Of those receiving the written consent form, 52.0% had gotten it the day before the surgery at the earliest 41.1% received it some hours or immediately before the procedure. The written IC form was explained to 65.6% of the patients, and 93.9% of them received further oral information that deemed understandable. Most attention was given to the diagnosis and the type of surgical procedure, which was communicated respectively to 92.8 and 88.2% of the patients. Almost one in two patients believed that the information provided some emotional relief, while 23.2% experienced increased anxiety. Younger patients and patients with higher levels of education were more likely to read the written IC form. The written IC form is not sufficient in assuring patients and making them fully aware of choices they made for their health; pre-operative information that was delivered orally better served the patients’ needs. To improve the quality of communication we suggest enhancing physicians’ communication skills and for them to use structured conversation to ensure that individuals are completely informed before undergoing their procedures.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The process of informed consent for urgent abdominal surgery.R. Kay - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (3):157-161.
Adequacy of informed consent in research carried out in Brazil.José Roberto Goldim, Joaquim Clotet & Jorge Pinto Ribeiro - 2006 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 16 (6):177-180.
From whom do physicians obtain consent for surgery?Zahra Jarayedi & Fariba Asghari - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (6):366-370.
Informed Consent to Breaking Bad News.Abraham Rudnick - 2002 - Nursing Ethics 9 (1):61-66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-08

Downloads
14 (#986,446)

6 months
4 (#778,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?