OUP Oxford (2002)
|Abstract||Alkire examines how Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen's capability approach can be coherently-and practically-put to work in participatory poverty reduction activities. Sen argues that economic development should expand 'valuable' capabilities. Alkire probes how we identify what is valuable. Sen deliberately left the capability approach 'incomplete' in order to ensure its relevance to persons and cultures with different understandings of the good. Part I proposes a framework for identifying valuable capabilities that retains this 'fundamental' incompleteness and space for individual and cultural diversity. Drawing on the work of John Finnis and others, Alkire addresses foundational issues regarding the identification and pursuit of 'valuable' dimensions of human development based in practical reason, then observes that much of the criticism of development arises from negative impacts on social or cultural/religious dimensions that are also deeply valued by the poor. Part I closes with a four-part 'operational definition' of basic capability that bridges 'basic needs', participation, and informed consent. Part II proposes an alternative participatory method for systematically identifying valued changes in participants' capability sets. Three case studies of women's income generation activities in Pakistan---goat-rearing, adult literacy, and rose cultivation---contrast economic cost-benefit analysis of each activity with capability analysis.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Buy the book||$73.20 used (27% off) $75.00 new (25% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Scott A. Anderson (2003). Sabina Alkire, Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction:Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. Ethics 113 (3):678-680.
Ingrid Robeyns (2003). Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction, Sabina Alkire. Oxford University Press, 2002, VII+340 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 19 (2):371-377.
Douglas A. Hicks (2002). Gender, Discrimination, and Capability: Insights From Amartya Sen. Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (1):137 - 154.
Melanie Walker (2010). Critical Capability Pedagogies and University Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (8):898-917.
Mozaffar Qizilbash (2006). Capability, Happiness and Adaptation in Sen and J. S. Mill. Utilitas 18 (1):20-32.
Serena Olsaretti (2005). Endorsement and Freedom in Amartya Sen's Capability Approach. Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):89-108.
Andrew Askland (1998). The Sen of Inequality. Journal of Philosophical Research 23:399-415.
Mozaffar Qizilbash (2007). Social Choice and Individual Capabilities. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):169-192.
Colleen Murphy & Paolo Gardoni (2010). Assessing Capability Instead of Achieved Functionings in Risk Analysis. Journal of Risk Research 13 (2):137-147.
Jay Drydyk (2012). A Capability Approach to Justice as a Virtue. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):23-38.
Justine Johnstone (2007). Technology as Empowerment: A Capability Approach to Computer Ethics. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1):73-87.
Jude Browne & Marc Stears (2005). Capabilities, Resources, and Systematic Injustice: A Case of Gender Inequality. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (3):355-373.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads1 ( #291,125 of 722,771 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,771 )
How can I increase my downloads?