Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Philosophy 84 (5):237-262 (1987)
|Abstract||238 THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY ently, believe that his theory asks too much, demanding total devo- tion to morality and treating everything worth doing (and perhaps more) as a duty. But, despite their differences, the two sets of|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lawrence J. Jost & Julian Wuerth (eds.) (2011). Perfecting Virtue: New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Gregory Mellema (1996). Is It Bad to Omit an Act of Supererogation? Journal of Philosophical Research 21:405-416.
Marcia Baron (2008). Virtue Ethics, Kantian Ethics, and the One Thought Too Many Objection. In Monika Betzler (ed.), Kant's Ethics of Virtues. Walter De Gruyter.
Jean-Paul Vessel (2010). Supererogation for Utilitarianism. American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):299 - 319.
Marcia Baron (1995). Kantian Ethics Almost Without Apology. Cornell University Press.
Henry S. Richardson (1997). Book Review:Kantian Ethics Almost Without Apology. Marcia W. Baron. [REVIEW] Ethics 107 (4):746-.
Douglas W. Portmore (forthcoming). Supererogation. In J. E. Crimmins & D. C. Long (eds.), Encyclopedia of Utilitarianism.
Roderick M. Chisholm & Ernest Sosa (1966). Intrinsic Preferability and the Problem of Supererogation. Synthese 16 (3-4):321 - 331.
David Heyd (1982). Supererogation: Its Status in Ethical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads72 ( #14,324 of 722,940 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,098 of 722,940 )
How can I increase my downloads?