Guidance Document: Good Academic Research Practices

, , , &
New Delhi: University Grants Commission (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Public trust in research and its output is essential for a healthy modern society. Although the research enterprise is self- correcting, this self-regulation occasionally needs help. Over the years, research institutions, professional societies, and governments have established several protocols, codes of conduct, norms, and principles to enhance that trust in research institutions, funders, producers, publishers, and products.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Trust me, I’m a researcher!: The role of trust in biomedical research.Angeliki Kerasidou - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (1):43-50.
Promoting Equity and Preventing Exploitation in International Research: The Aims, Work, and Output of the TRUST Project.Julie Cook, Kate Chatfield & Doris Schroeder - 2018 - In Zvonimir Koporc (ed.), Ethics and Integrity in Health and Life Sciences Research (Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity, Volume 4). Emerald Publishing Limited. pp. 11-31.
Developing ethics guidance for HIV prevention research: the HIV Prevention Trials Network approach.Stuart Rennie & Jeremy Sugarman - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (12):810-815.
Regulation and the social licence for medical research.Mary Dixon-Woods & Richard E. Ashcroft - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (4):381-391.
Ethics in Research in Mathematics Education.Allan Okech - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (2):129-135.
Government subsidized academic research: Economic and ethical conflicts. [REVIEW]Michael Devaney - 2004 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (3):273-285.
Authorship Policies at U.S. Doctoral Universities: A Review and Recommendations for Future Policies.Lisa M. Rasmussen, Courtney E. Williams, Mary M. Hausfeld, George C. Banks & Bailey C. Davis - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6):3393-3413.
A code of ethics for the life sciences.Nancy L. Jones - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):25-43.
Four forward-looking guidance points.Ruth Macklin - 2001 - Developing World Bioethics 1 (2):121–134.
Trust, trustworthiness and sharing patient data for research.Mark Sheehan, Phoebe Friesen, Adrian Balmer, Corina Cheeks, Sara Davidson, James Devereux, Douglas Findlay, Katharine Keats-Rohan, Rob Lawrence & Kamran Shafiq - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):e26-e26.
Research misconduct among clinical trial staff.Barbara K. Redman, Thomas N. Templin & Jon F. Merz - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):481-489.
How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.Nannan Yi, Benoit Nemery & Kris Dierickx - 2019 - Developing World Bioethics 19 (2):64-75.
Catholic Social Teaching as a Framework for Research Ethics.Alan J. Kearns - 2014 - Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (2):145-159.
Continuing Ethics Review Practices by Canadian Research Ethics Boards.Karleen Norton & Donna Wilson - 2008 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 30 (3).
Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research.Kenneth D. Butterfield, Linda Klebe Trevino & Donald L. McCabe - 2001 - Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):219-232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-24

Downloads
170 (#114,397)

6 months
46 (#92,168)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Responsible conduct of research.Adil E. Shamoo - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David B. Resnik.

Add more references