Graduate studies at Western
Critical Review 17 (1-2):155-170 (2005)
|Abstract||Abstract Socialism is strictly ?impossible.? Its impracticability is not, as Bryan Caplan has suggested, a ?quantitative? matter, nor does he show that real?world socialism's incentive problems outweighed its informational ones. Caplan's criticism of Ludwig von Mises's critique of the ?possibility? of socialism fails to appreciate what he meant by ?socialism? and misunderstands Mises's argument about economic calculation. History, too, suggests that socialism's informational deficiency was the most significant problem facing those who tried to implement socialism.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Gordon (2005). Calculation and Chaos: Reply to Caplan. Critical Review 17 (1-2):171-178.
Bryan Caplan (2004). Is Socialism Really “Impossible”? Critical Review 16 (1):33-52.
Rodolfo A. Gonzalez & Edward Stringham (2005). Incentives Vs. Knowledge: Reply to Caplan. Critical Review 17 (1-2):179-202.
Bryan Caplan (2005). Toward a New Consensus on the Economics of Socialism: Rejoinder to My Critics. Critical Review 17 (1-2):203-220.
Nigel Pleasants (1997). The Epistemological Argument Against Socialism: A Wittgensteinian Critique of Hayek and Giddens. Inquiry 40 (1):23 – 45.
J. M. Fritzman (2002). Why I Hardly Read Althusser. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 9 (1):47-59.
David Ramsay Steele (1996). Between Immorality and Unfeasibility: The Market Socialist Predicament. Critical Review 10 (3):307-331.
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads4 ( #189,403 of 739,671 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,671 )
How can I increase my downloads?