How unlikely is a doomsday catastrophe?, With Max tegmark, published in
| Abstract | published in Nature | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesKB Korb & JJ Oliver (1999). Comment on Nick Bostrom's 'the Doomsday Argument is Alive and Kicking'. Mind 108 (431):551-553.
N. Bostrom (1999). The Doomsday Argument is Alive and Kicking. Mind 108 (431):539-551.
Nick Bostrom & Milan M. Cirković (2003). The Doomsday Argument and the Self–Indication Assumption: Reply to Olum. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):83–91.
Bradley Monton (2003). The Doomsday Argument Without Knowledge of Birth Rank. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):79–82.
D. J. Bradley (2005). No Doomsday Argument Without Knowledge of Birth Rank: A Defense of Bostrom. Synthese 144 (1):91 - 100.
Alasdair M. Richmond (2008). Doomsday, Bishop Ussher and Simulated Worlds. Ratio 21 (2):201–217.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads30 ( #40,850 of 549,078 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,722 of 549,078 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
